A little green chair writhes in what looks like the last gesture from a sick bed, a kind of sheet-plucking, alongside a round mirror which shares its affliction. A bowl of oranges are more orange than they have any right to be and are being observed the way Monet drew his dying wife’s face. Or a large jug falls in an endlessly preserved moment, full of heaviness, from a stand. The objects which surround us have a secret life and a secret death, endlessly developed by processes that resemble, in their slicing through of layers, a CAT scan.
There is probably not a person alive, owner of at least one possession, who has not experienced what we call ‘still life’. The setter of a table, the arranger of a vase of flowers, even – and most particularly – the random arrangements and juxtapositions of our daily lives which can be astounding.
For Clay Bodvin the formal part of this fascination began at Green River College and continued at the University of Washington, Seattle. ‘The drawing instructor would bring in a pile of rubble from his garage: a pot, a cow’s skull, a bicycle handle, cigar box, bunch of plastic flowers. Sometimes the pile covered a large table. The students were expected to isolate something that interested them.’ |
|
| Writing in Tate Neil Cox has used the term ‘melting beauty’ to describe the work of Matisse where ‘the phenomenal world is reformed in sensuous matter’. This recognition, pre-dating our scientific advances, seems always to have been present in still life: the skull, fainting flower, crawling and ominous fly, poultry with an unhealthy sheen. |
This unsteadyness, even in the fresh and glowing, causes the space between objects to take on an added significance. ‘I don’t paint things. I only paint the difference between things’, Matisse declared. Thus a vase with an ornate silverbeet pattern and a lid like a Kaiser’s helmet can be seen in stages of solidity, then reacting to the colour of objects in its range, finally heading towards a collapse that possesses a strange beauty.
The method, leading to such planned controlled accidents as the chair, the hovering jug, contains traditional steps. ‘The whole process relates exactly to what happens in a painter’s studio.’ First comes photography with a thirty year old Canon FTQL, bought in Vietnam where Bodvin was ‘an army grunt’ (Fourth Infantry Division). Over the years an extensive library of images has been built up, including recurring subjects: mirrors, tables, chandeliers, a significant anchoring little black triangular table. Developing film is a trip to the chemist in Titirangi. At this stage there is no concern about colour-correctness since everything is about to undergo extensive revision.
Once the prints have been scanned into the computer and converted to accessible digital files, traditional collage and montage techniques are applied to what is the computer ‘canvas area’ equivalent to a stretched canvas. Painting, a choice of 'brush' size, the building up of layers continue the resemblances. The chair becomes green or yellow, the backdrop – there is a Matisse-like fascination with collecting fabric samples – is scanned in. A bunch of objects is dropped on top of the fabric surfaces, one or two of which may be enlarged disproportionately. |
|
 |
In earlier works multiple perspectives were played with; more recently the depth has been flattened so the objects occupy the same plane. Overdrawing in charcoal and grease pencil continue the artist’s involvement over top of digitally printed images. ‘What happens at any one stage is unpredicatable but the end result is completely controllable.’ Once the final version is reached, specialist digital printers can produce the work on fine art paper, canvas, vinyl, acetate or even aluminium sheets, ready for exhibiting. Banner drops, artist screens (suitable for a living room) A4 pinups (my chair and oranges in a limited edition of twelve) are among the possibilities. |
| In New Zealand maybe a dozen or so artists are using this type of photomedia as their primary mode. While a secure tradition has been established in Europe and North America, based on early innovators such as Nam June Paik, here Bodvin suggests new media is re-fighting the battles for acceptance that once applied to photography and print making. Prior to the Vodafone Digital Art Awards (2005) there were no formal awards for photo-media art to speak of. Significantly the Wallace Awards accept original photography but exclude digital prints. One problem is establishing protocols. |
|
| ‘We have to embrace the conditions of limited edition art works, so it is encumbent on the artist to be honest,’ Bodvin says. He cites the old etching masters who destroyed or gouged their plates after one hundred uses and thinks this expected honesty should be able to be transferred over to digital fine art today without any difficulty. If the processes of digital art seem simpler to some, the hours spent may be roughly similar. The same aesthetics are required: the search for lightness, brightness, freshness.
Series of work with names like Floating-Room, Aqua-Room (recently on show at Lopdell Gallery, Titirangi) Redux and Gridded-Room each represent a different painterly style. |
 |
And then there is the question of the socks which caused such disapproving salon-generated looks in Paris. In 1996 Bodvin found a product line called ‘Director’s Socks’ at Art Gallery of New South Wales. He now chooses his foot colours as carefully as he manipulates a screen: lime green on the left foot partners orange on the right, fushcia escorts cyan blue, green walks with yellow. An elegant jacket and stand-out socks. Most recently Bodvin has become a founding member of a collective, Mappa Mundi, with David and Elizabeth Genovesi in Rome, Tony Kirchner and Mike Braun in Denver. Kirchner is a technical |
| innovator whose work appeared at last year’s Florence Biennale; Braun is a Flash wizard; while the Genovesis have European and North American reputations. So far two collective pieces have been produced and Mappa Mundi is working on formalising their working parameters. Bodvin is also an accomplished photographer with work shown by the London Photographic Association. |
| |
Sometimes considered as a harbinger of materialism, it may be that still life is entering a new and richer field. It possesses a traditional power to draw us to itself. Its colours, its juxtapositions, might seem as random as our lives did we not attempt to record them in art or words. Yet who is to say where the order lies? A visual feast is constantly being re-arranged in front of us which we are invited to examine, looking for structure, harmony, symbiosis, ultimately the human condition.
This is what makes Clay Bodvin’s still lifes so rewarding. Lost in the rich oranges I could hardy tell if I wanted them to go on disintegrating as if there might be another beauty to come. As for the little green chair, it seems to be performing a manic dance of destruction, like the loss of the spirit from the body. It reminds me of a quote from Alan Badiou, on eternity. ‘Eternity does not consist in remaining as one is or in duration. Eternity is precisely what watches over disappearance’.
Elizabeth Smither |